Comparing Cognitive, Metacognitive, and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Models of Depression: a Longitudinal Study Survey

actpapercliniciantier 3link oklink-only

Open source

Overview

AI-generated summary, not a substitute for reading the source.

This longitudinal study examines how psychological inflexibility mediates the relationship between depressogenic schemas and dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs and subsequent depressive symptoms in nonclinical participants. The research compares cognitive, metacognitive, and acceptance and commitment therapy models using survey data collected over nine months. It is intended for readers interested in the theoretical interrelationships among these therapeutic frameworks.

ID
bc744e8ac77f406b
Source org
OpenAlex
Author
Francisco J. Ruiz (Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz), Paula Odriozola-González (Universidad de Oviedo)
Published
2015-01-01
OA status
green
DOI
10.1017/sjp.2015.31
PMID
Not recorded
PMCID
Not recorded
Citations
28

Tags

Verification

Automated checks only, not clinical endorsement or advice.

Cite this entry

BibTeX

@article{allodium:bc744e8ac77f406b,
  title = {Comparing Cognitive, Metacognitive, and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Models of Depression: a Longitudinal Study Survey},
  author = {Francisco J. Ruiz and Paula Odriozola-González},
  year = {2015},
  journal = {OpenAlex},
  doi = {10.1017/sjp.2015.31},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2015.31}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparing Cognitive, Metacognitive, and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Models of Depression: a Longitudinal Study Survey
AU  - Ruiz, Francisco J.
AU  - Odriozola-González, Paula
PY  - 2015
PB  - OpenAlex
DO  - 10.1017/sjp.2015.31
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2015.31
ER  -

APA

Ruiz, F. J., & Odriozola-González, P. (2015). Comparing Cognitive, Metacognitive, and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Models of Depression: a Longitudinal Study Survey. OpenAlex. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2015.31

Related entries

More like this